POLITICAL POSITION · INSTRUMENT EVIDENCE-POL-1
Political position in 12 dimensions, computed in your browser.
48 original statements, a 5 point scale with "don't know" and a 0 to 100 score per dimension, with coverage and confidence declared. Nothing is sent to the server and the result is not indexed.
What it is
evidence-pol-1 is Evidence's own instrument for recording political position as evidence: answers given to known statements, on a date, with a declared method. The result does not label anyone. It shows which way the answers point in each dimension, how many answers support each number and how confident the number is.
Position is not reduced to left and right. Political science shows that economic, cultural and institutional attitudes vary independently, so the instrument keeps 12 separate dimensions and never sums them into a single score.
The 12 dimensions
Each dimension runs from pole A (score 0) to pole B (score 100). 50 means the answers balance out, not that the position is "center".
| Dimension | Pole A (0) | Pole B (100) | What it measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| State structure | Federal | Unitary | Where decisions sit: spread across states and municipalities (federal) or concentrated in the central government (unitary). |
| Representation | Democracy | Autocracy | How power is legitimized: elections, checks by independent institutions and pluralism (democracy) or concentrated, lightly checked authority (autocracy). |
| State power | Security | Liberty | The balance between state powers to ensure order and security and individual safeguards against those powers. |
| Immigration | Assimilation | Multiculturalism | What is expected of newcomers: adopting the destination culture (assimilation) or cultures living side by side with public recognition (multiculturalism). |
| Diplomacy | Militarist | Pacifist | The weight of military force in foreign policy: armed power as a central tool (militarist) or negotiation, mediation and arms reduction (pacifist). |
| Foreign intervention | Non-interventionist | Nationalist | The stance toward other countries: not interfering and honoring international commitments (non-interventionist) or asserting the national interest above them (nationalist). |
| Ownership | Public | Private | Who should own the means of production and essential services: the state (public) or private firms (private). |
| Economic coordination | Planning | Free market | How the economy is coordinated: targets, prices and credit steered by government (planning) or set by supply and demand (free market). |
| Foreign trade | Protectionism | Globalism | Openness to foreign trade and investment: protecting domestic production (protectionism) or integrating into global markets (globalism). |
| Religion | Irreligious | Religious | The place of religion in public life and law: strict separation (irreligious) or religion as a reference for the state (religious). It does not measure personal faith. |
| Social norms | Progressive | Traditionalist | How law relates to social norms: keeping up with social change (progressive) or preserving inherited norms (traditionalist). |
| Technology | Technology | Biology | The stance on technologies that change body and life: adopting and extending abilities (technology) or respecting natural limits and precaution (biology). Thinner conceptual basis than the other dimensions. |
Method
- 48 statements, 4 per dimension. In every dimension, agreeing with two statements points to pole B and agreeing with the other two points to pole A, so automatic agreement does not push the score.
- Answer scale: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree, Don't know. "Don't know" does not score and lowers coverage.
- Statements are interleaved across dimensions and the dimension is not shown during the questionnaire.
- Wording rules: one idea per statement, no named party, candidate or person, no loaded adjective, a concrete trade-off whenever possible.
position of an answer p = (value − 1) / 4 (inverted statement: 1 − p)
score = mean of p × 100 (no scored answer: UNKNOWN)
coverage = scored answers / 4
consistency = 1 − 2 × standard deviation of p (one answer only: not measurable, 0.50 in the index)
confidence = coverage × consistency (high ≥ 0.75, medium ≥ 0.50, low below)
Answering "strongly agree" to everything yields 50 with consistency 0 and low confidence: the instrument shows the contradiction instead of hiding it.
Privacy
- Political opinion is sensitive personal data under Brazil's LGPD (art. 11). That is why everything runs in the browser: no account, no form, no analytics and no request with your answers.
- Answers stay in this browser tab (cleared when it closes) and in the result address after the #, which is never sent to the server. A button clears them.
- The result page is noindex. The portable URL carries only the 12 scores and the date, never a name.
- Saving the result in an Evidence workspace is a separate, explicit step: you paste the URL in /app and confirm "Manter como evidência". The vector is then private to the workspace, versioned and can be deleted for good.
Limitations
- Not a scientifically validated instrument in this version: there is no reliability test, validity study or population norm.
- Four statements per dimension is few: one answer moves the score a lot, which is why confidence is declared per dimension.
- Self-assessment on a date: the result records answers, not behavior, vote or anyone's political essence.
- The wording was written for the Brazilian context; the same text may read differently in another country.
- Scores from different instruments are not on the same ruler; the comparison shows differences, not errors.
Other instruments
The 12 dimension structure takes the multidimensional principle as reference, but no statement, profile, weight or catalog of another instrument (12Axes, Political Compass, 8Values or any other) was used. A result from another instrument enters only when the person pastes its URL, and is shown as IMPORTED next to this one, with its limitations.
Conceptual sources by dimension
The sources define the concept of each dimension; the wording of the statements is Evidence's own.
State structure
- Chapel Hill Expert Survey, dimensão de descentralização e regionalismo
- Manifesto Project, categorias per301 (descentralização) e per302 (centralização)
- Hooghe, Marks, Schakel, Chapman Osterkatz, Niedzwiecki e Shair-Rosenfield (2016), Measuring Regional Authority, Oxford University Press
- Lijphart (2012), Patterns of Democracy, dimensão federal e unitária, Yale University Press
Representation
- V-Dem, Varieties of Democracy, índices de democracia eleitoral e liberal
- Manifesto Project, categoria per202 (democracia)
State power
- Chapel Hill Expert Survey, dimensão liberdades civis versus lei e ordem
- Manifesto Project, categorias per605 (lei e ordem) e per201 (liberdade e direitos humanos)
Immigration
- Chapel Hill Expert Survey, dimensões de política imigratória e multiculturalismo
- Manifesto Project, categorias per607 e per608 (multiculturalismo positivo e negativo)
- Banting e Kymlicka, Multiculturalism Policy Index, Queen's University
Diplomacy
- Manifesto Project, categorias per104 e per105 (forças armadas positivo e negativo) e per106 (paz)
- Hurwitz e Peffley (1987), How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model, American Political Science Review
Foreign intervention
- Manifesto Project, categorias per107 e per109 (internacionalismo positivo e negativo) e per601 (modo de vida nacional)
- Hooghe e Marks (2018), Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage, Journal of European Public Policy
Ownership
- Manifesto Project, categorias per413 (nacionalização) e per401 (economia de livre mercado)
- Chapel Hill Expert Survey, posição econômica esquerda e direita
- World Values Survey, itens sobre propriedade pública e privada de empresas
Economic coordination
- Manifesto Project, categorias per401 (livre mercado), per404 (planejamento econômico) e per412 (economia controlada)
- Chapel Hill Expert Survey, dimensões de intervenção estatal e desregulação
Foreign trade
- Manifesto Project, categorias per406 e per407 (protecionismo positivo e negativo)
- Hooghe e Marks (2018), Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage, Journal of European Public Policy
Religion
- Norris e Inglehart (2004), Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide, Cambridge University Press
- World Values Survey, eixo de valores tradicionais e seculares
- Chapel Hill Expert Survey, dimensão de princípios religiosos na política
Social norms
- Hooghe, Marks e Wilson (2002), Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?, Comparative Political Studies (eixo GAL e TAN)
- Chapel Hill Expert Survey, dimensão de estilo de vida e costumes
- Manifesto Project, categorias per603 e per604 (moralidade tradicional positiva e negativa)
Technology
- Manifesto Project, categorias per411 (tecnologia e infraestrutura) e per416 (economia antiprodutivista e sustentabilidade)
- Allum, Sturgis, Tabourazi e Brunton-Smith (2008), Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis, Public Understanding of Science
Design of the instrument
- Feldman e Johnston (2014), Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity, Political Psychology
- Treier e Hillygus (2009), The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate, Public Opinion Quarterly
- Billiet e McClendon (2000), Modeling Acquiescence in Measurement Models for Two Balanced Sets of Items, Structural Equation Modeling
- Chapel Hill Expert Survey
- Manifesto Project (MARPOR), esquema de codificação
Frequently asked questions
Are my answers sent to any server?
No. The questionnaire and the calculation run in your browser. Answers stay in the open tab and in the result page address, after the #, a part the browser does not send. Only what you choose to copy or take to your workspace leaves this page.
Does the result say what my ideology is?
No. The result shows which way the answers point in each of the 12 dimensions, on a date, with the confidence of each number. There is no label for people, no ranking and no voting advice.
Is the instrument scientifically validated?
Not yet. This version has no reliability study, validity study or population norms. The dimensions rest on the political science literature cited below, but the statement wording is original and has not been tested on a sample.
Can I compare with another test's result?
Yes. On the result page, paste the URL of another recognized instrument (such as 12Axes) and see the differences per dimension. It is read in the browser, and the notice makes clear that different instruments are not on the same ruler.