PARTY · REPUBLICANOS
REPUBLICANOS in Parliament: cohesion, attendance and recent votes
Votes of REPUBLICANOS members in the roll-call votes of the period, with the published guidance. The numbers describe what was recorded; they are not a score or an ideological position.
Chamber of Deputies
Recent votes
| Date | Vote Observed | Yes Observed | No Observed | Other present Observed | Rice Derived | Party guidance Observed | Government guidance Observed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLP 281/2019 | 33 | 3 | 1 | 0.833 | n/a | No | |
| PLP 186/2026 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 1.000 | n/a | Yes | |
| PLP 186/2026 | 2 | 32 | 1 | 0.882 | n/a | No | |
| PLP 74/2026 | 31 | 1 | 1 | 0.938 | n/a | Yes | |
| PL 4921/2026 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 0.857 | n/a | Yes | |
| PLP 230/2025 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 0.944 | n/a | No | |
| PLP 80/2026 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 1.000 | n/a | n/a | |
| PLP 114/2026 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 0.680 | n/a | No | |
| PLP 114/2026 | 6 | 26 | 1 | 0.625 | n/a | No | |
| PLP 114/2026 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 0.886 | n/a | Yes |
Members
Alphabetical order. Each rate is a count of votes over the comparable total, shown in brackets.
| Member | State | Attendance Derived | Votes equal to the party guidance Derived | Votes equal to the Government guidance Derived | Speeches (90 days) Observed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albuquerque | RR | 89.3% (201/225) | Unknown | 71.0% (110/155) | 0 |
| Aluisio Mendes | MA | 83.6% (188/225) | Unknown | 64.4% (94/146) | 2 |
| Amom Mandel | AM | 63.6% (143/225) | Unknown | 71.7% (76/106) | 0 |
| Augusto Coutinho | PE | 86.7% (195/225) | Unknown | 79.2% (118/149) | 5 |
| Beto Pereira | MS | 79.1% (178/225) | Unknown | 65.7% (92/140) | 0 |
| Bruno Farias | MG | 72.0% (162/225) | Unknown | 59.7% (74/124) | 0 |
| Carlos Gomes | RS | 53.8% (121/225) | Unknown | 78.0% (71/91) | 0 |
| Celso Russomanno | SP | 81.8% (184/225) | Unknown | 69.9% (102/146) | Unknown |
| Daniela do Waguinho | RJ | 72.9% (164/225) | Unknown | 94.4% (117/124) | 3 |
| Diego Coronel | BA | 90.2% (203/225) | Unknown | 72.2% (114/158) | 0 |
| Eli Borges | TO | 90.7% (204/225) | 93.9% (124/132) | 41.8% (66/158) | 4 |
| Euclydes Pettersen | MG | 55.1% (124/225) | Unknown | 70.0% (70/100) | 0 |
| Evair Vieira de Melo | ES | 87.6% (197/225) | Unknown | 22.1% (34/154) | 0 |
| Franciane Bayer | RS | 84.9% (191/225) | Unknown | 53.8% (78/145) | 0 |
| Fred Linhares | DF | 92.0% (207/225) | Unknown | 69.4% (111/160) | 0 |
| Geovania de Sá | SC | 84.0% (189/225) | Unknown | 23.1% (34/147) | 1 |
| Gilberto Abramo | MG | 52.4% (118/225) | Unknown | 75.0% (66/88) | 0 |
| Hugo Motta | PB | 56.0% (126/225) | Unknown | 100.0% (7/7) | 15 |
| Icaro de Valmir | SE | 94.7% (213/225) | 71.0% (93/131) | 68.5% (113/165) | 1 |
| Jadyel Alencar | PI | 76.9% (173/225) | Unknown | 70.8% (92/130) | 0 |
| Jorge Braz | RJ | 88.4% (199/225) | Unknown | 67.3% (103/153) | 1 |
| Jorge Goetten | SC | 97.3% (219/225) | Unknown | 69.8% (118/169) | 0 |
| Juarez Costa | MT | 72.9% (164/225) | Unknown | 70.3% (90/128) | 0 |
| Julio Cesar Ribeiro | DF | 95.1% (214/225) | Unknown | 64.2% (106/165) | 3 |
| Lêda Borges | GO | 64.4% (145/225) | Unknown | 80.9% (93/115) | 1 |
| Leo Prates | BA | 60.0% (135/225) | 98.4% (60/61) | 93.1% (94/101) | 0 |
| Marcelo Crivella | RJ | 85.3% (192/225) | Unknown | 65.8% (96/146) | 0 |
| Marcelo Nilo | BA | 25.3% (57/225) | Unknown | 72.5% (29/40) | 0 |
| Márcio Marinho | BA | 68.0% (153/225) | Unknown | 74.6% (85/114) | 1 |
| Marcos Pereira | SP | 59.1% (133/225) | Unknown | 66.7% (70/105) | 0 |
| Maria Rosas | SP | 92.9% (209/225) | Unknown | 63.8% (104/163) | 3 |
| Marussa Boldrin | GO | 50.2% (113/225) | Unknown | 52.2% (47/90) | 4 |
| Milton Vieira | SP | 28.4% (64/225) | Unknown | 68.1% (32/47) | 0 |
| Murilo Galdino | PB | 68.0% (153/225) | Unknown | 76.7% (89/116) | 1 |
| Pedro Lupion | PR | 62.2% (140/225) | Unknown | 36.7% (40/109) | 0 |
| Ricardo Ayres | TO | 97.3% (219/225) | Unknown | 72.6% (122/168) | 14 |
| Roberto Duarte | AC | 97.8% (220/225) | Unknown | 39.4% (67/170) | 13 |
| Rogéria Santos | BA | 83.1% (187/225) | Unknown | 71.5% (103/144) | 0 |
| Rosangela Gomes | RJ | 36.9% (83/225) | Unknown | 69.8% (44/63) | 1 |
| Silas Câmara | AM | 47.6% (107/225) | Unknown | 73.3% (63/86) | 0 |
| Silvio Costa Filho | PE | 21.8% (49/225) | Unknown | 76.5% (26/34) | 7 |
| Thiago de Joaldo | SE | 79.6% (179/225) | Unknown | 60.9% (84/138) | 0 |
| Wilson Santiago | PB | 59.6% (134/225) | Unknown | 76.9% (80/104) | Unknown |
Federal Senate
Recent votes
| Date | Vote Observed | Yes Observed | No Observed | Other present Observed | Rice Derived |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLP 186/2026 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | |
| PEC 221/2019 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0.667 | |
| PEC 221/2019 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0.667 | |
| PLP 74/2026 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | |
| PLP 114/2026 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0.500 | |
| PLP 114/2026 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.500 | |
| PLP 124/2022 (Substitutivo-CD) | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | |
| PLP 18/2021 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1.000 | |
| PLP 18/2021 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.333 | |
| PLP 18/2021 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
Members
Alphabetical order. Each rate is a count of votes over the comparable total, shown in brackets.
| Member | State | Attendance Derived |
|---|---|---|
| Alan Rick | AC | 100.0% (90/90) |
| Angelo Coronel | BA | 86.7% (78/90) |
| Cleitinho | MG | 100.0% (90/90) |
| Damares Alves | DF | 100.0% (90/90) |
| Hamilton Mourão | RS | 95.6% (86/90) |
| Roberta Acioly | RR | 100.0% (59/59) |
Method
Formula Rice(party, vote) = |Yes - No| / (Yes + No), only when Yes + No >= 3; abstention, obstruction and absence are excluded
Formula party cohesion = simple mean of Rice over the open roll-call votes of the period where Rice was computed
Formula party alignment = votes equal to the own party guidance (or the federation guidance when the party gives none) / comparable votes (guidance and vote in Yes, No, Abstention or Obstruction; Free vote, no guidance and bloc-only guidance are excluded)
Formula guidance equal to the government = votes where the party guidance matches the Government leadership guidance / votes where both are comparable
Formula attendance (Chamber) = roll-call votes with a recorded vote / roll-call votes of the period; the API lists only who recorded a vote, so a substitute who took office mid-period shows a lower rate
Formula attendance (Senate) = votes where the senator is listed as present (voted, Yes, No, Abstention, present without vote or presiding) / votes where the senator is listed
About this data
- What it measures
- Plenary roll-call votes of the Chamber and the Senate, party guidance published by the Chamber and derived counts: Rice cohesion by party, votes equal to the guidance and attendance.
- Source
- Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and Federal Senate, open data APIs: 6 files in the sources table, with the URL and SHA-256 of every request in the manifest.
- Unit
- Votes (records); rates from 0% to 100% over the comparable total, shown in brackets; Rice index from 0 to 1.
- Period
- to
- Last collected
- Next scheduled collection
- Daily at 11:15 UTC (08:15 in Brasília), by the
evidence-parlamentoengine, which checks the SHA-256 of every file. This page changes on the next site publication. - Maintained by
- Reveno Evidence ·
evidence-parlamentoengine, owner Thiago Holtz - Evidence state
- Observed Derived
- Version
- Collection content, SHA-256
f1f1ac213128f5c60d6520daa601c40663f5b03d31dd7e15521d18e272a0b322 - License
- Source data license: the Chamber and Senate APIs declare no license in the response; terms at https://dadosabertos.camara.leg.br/swagger/api.html and https://legis.senado.leg.br/dadosabertos/docs/. License for the Reveno text and calculations: not declared yet; until then, cite this page.
Download the data
What is on screen
The tables on this page as CSV, with unformatted numbers and the evidence state of every row.
The full set, with a manifest
A ZIP with every file behind the page, a README with the citation and license, and a manifest with the SHA-256 of each file.
For machines
A JSON at a stable address, with metadata, citation, tables and sources. The address does not change between publications; the content changes when the collection changes.
- Summary by party for machines
https://evidence.reveno.com.br/parlamento/resumo.json
- Summary by party for machines
How to cite
Short citation for a chart or table caption, or a note
Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and Federal Senate (2026), processed by Reveno Evidence
Full citation with URL and access date
Reveno Evidence (2026). REPUBLICANOS in Parliament: cohesion, attendance and member votes [Data set]. Source data: open data APIs of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and Federal Senate, collected on 2026-11-03 (UTC), votes from 2025-11-03 to 2026-11-03. Collection content, SHA-256 f1f1ac213128f5c60d6520daa601c40663f5b03d31dd7e15521d18e272a0b322. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://evidence.reveno.com.br/en/parliament/parties/republicanos/
BibTeX
@misc{reveno_evidence_parlamento_republicanos,
author = {{Reveno Evidence}},
title = {REPUBLICANOS in Parliament: cohesion, attendance and member votes},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Reveno},
url = {https://evidence.reveno.com.br/en/parliament/parties/republicanos/},
urldate = {2026-11-03},
note = {Source data: open data APIs of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and Federal Senate, collected on 2026-11-03 (UTC), votes from 2025-11-03 to 2026-11-03. Collection content, SHA-256 f1f1ac213128f5c60d6520daa601c40663f5b03d31dd7e15521d18e272a0b322}
}The access date is filled in with the date of this version of the page; replace it with the date you accessed it.
When you use a number, also cite the source file: id, URL and SHA-256 are in the sources table.
Source data license: the Chamber and Senate APIs declare no license in the response; terms at https://dadosabertos.camara.leg.br/swagger/api.html and https://legis.senado.leg.br/dadosabertos/docs/. License for the Reveno text and calculations: not declared yet; until then, cite this page.