CLAIM · BR-PRES-2026
“The extension of voting hours changed the winner”
Unsupported. No collected evidence supports the claim. It does not mean the claim was refuted: it means that, with what was collected, it does not hold.
State: Unsupported0 in favour · 0 against · 0 contextCase BR-PRES-2026
Proof chain
In favour (0)
No evidence in favour is recorded.
Against (0)
No evidence against is recorded.
Context (0)
No context item.
Ledger rationale (Portuguese): Nenhuma evidência coletada vincula a prorrogação ao resultado. O cálculo contra a margem fica pendente da contagem oficial de votos depois das 17h.
What is observed, derived and unknown
- Observed
- Nothing in this chain.
read from a primary source with URL and SHA-256 checked
- Derived
- Nothing in this chain.
a declared calculation over observed items
- Unknown
- No evidence is recorded for the claim: it stays without support and without contradiction.
a legitimate absence: no collected source supports the item
What is missing to confirm
The calculation that would decide it is votes_after_5pm >= final_margin. The final margin is already observed; the official count of votes after 5 p.m. is missing (the site answered HTTP 403 to the automated client, and that block is not bypassed). With it, the claim becomes a derived calculation: if those votes are below the margin, the winner would be the same without them; if they reach it, the calculation does not rule out an effect, and who they went to would still be unknown.
Sources in the chain
No source cited in this chain.